Skip to main content
Jury-based awards add credibility and inclusivity by incorporating peer review, scoring, and voting. Use jury panels for prestigious awards, competitions, or transparent selection processes.
Jury-based awards are available in the enterprise version of Empuls. Contact your account manager or CSM to enable this feature.

How it works

The jury award process has four stages:
Jury award flow from nominator to first-level review, jury panel, and moderator

1. Nominator

The nominator nominates colleagues, direct reports, or themselves (based on admin-defined rules) by stating why the nominee deserves the award. The nominator may be required to provide a free-form justification or answer specific admin-defined questions.
Nominator submitting a nomination with justification text

2. First-level reviewer

The first-level reviewer filters nominations to eliminate duplicates and subpar submissions. They either approve the nomination and forward it to the jury, or decline it.

3. Jury panel

A group of users responsible for shortlisting the most deserving nominations. Each jury member rates nominations on a 10-point scale, a 5-point scale, or binary (approve/decline), reading the justification provided by the nominator. Once all jury members rate the nominations, their opinions are sent to the moderator.
Jury panel rating screen showing nominations on a 10-point scale

4. Moderator

The moderator approves nominations based on jury ratings. They can view nomination ratings as soon as jury members begin scoring. The moderator shortlists the top nominations and approves them individually to announce winners. The moderator then declines all other nominations. While a nomination is pending, the moderator can also edit its citation and the nominator’s answers to award questions from the nomination detail view. This lets them clean up the content before it appears in the winner announcement. See Rating nominations as a jury for the steps. Budget points are deducted from the approver at the configured budget owner level and credited to the winner’s account as rewards. By default, that approver is the moderator (final approver), but you can also set the Nominator or an Nth-level approver as the budget owner. Only the budget-owning approver sees the wallet-selection step in their Approve modal. For a walkthrough, see Budget Ownership in Approval Chains.
Moderator view with jury ratings and approve and decline actions

When to use jury-based awards

Jury awards are recommended when:
  • The award is given to the top 1% of the organisation in a year.
  • Selection is assigned to senior employees such as CXOs or BU Heads.
  • The award is issued half-yearly or annually.

Sample templates

a) Employee of the Year

Objective: Recognise the employee who has brought the organisation closest to its mission and vision by displaying organisational values. Evaluation criteria: The employee must be personally and independently responsible for the success of a project or initiative that resulted in organisational growth. Questions to answer:
  • What organisational value has the employee displayed?
  • When and how did the employee demonstrate the organisational value that led to a successful outcome?
  • What is the impact of the employee’s contribution towards organisational goals?

b) Sales Champion of the Year

Objective: Motivate the high sales achiever who contributed most towards the organisational revenue goal. Evaluation criteria: The employee must have achieved their own targets and contributed to their team’s overall targets. Questions to answer:
  • What is the employee’s revenue target vs achievement?
  • What is the employee’s share of the overall revenue target for the team?
  • Why does the employee deserve to be the Sales Champion of the Year?

Steps to set up a jury-based award

1

Navigate to the Admin Dashboard

Go to Reports and Admin > Programs > Awards & Core Values > Create Award.
Programs > Awards & Core Values > Create Award navigation in the Admin Dashboard
2

Select the award type

Select Award that requires a Jury Panel’s review and click Proceed.
Award type selection screen with Jury Panel review option highlighted
3

Fill in award details

Enter the award name, description, image, and recipient type. Click Continue.An award recipient can be an individual, a team, or kept flexible.
Award details form with fields for name, description, image, and recipient type
4

Configure the reward

Choose to reward points or gift cards and merchandise.
Reward configuration for jury award with points and merchandise options
5

Define nominee, nominator, and approver eligibility

Set constraints on who can nominate, who can be nominated, and who can approve.
Nominee, nominator, and approver eligibility configuration panel
Advanced eligibility filter settings for nominator and nominee constraints
Use OR when matching any one clause is sufficient. Use AND when all clauses must match.
6

Set jury and approver selection

Click the pencil icon and select First Level Approver, Jury, and Moderator. Use advanced filters to refine your selection.
Jury and Approver Selection screen with Jury and Moderator fields
Choose who owns the budget. Use the Budget owner dropdown on this screen to decide which approver funds the award. Options are:
  • Nominator — the person who submits the nomination selects the wallet and points are deducted from their account when the award is approved.
  • Nth Level Approver — the first-level approver, jury, or any intermediate approver becomes the budget owner. They pick the wallet when they act on the nomination.
  • Final Approver (default) — the moderator picks the wallet at the final approval step. This matches the pre-existing behaviour.
Only the approver at the configured level sees the wallet-selection block in their Approve modal. Everyone else in the chain acts without picking a wallet. See Budget Ownership in Approval Chains for a demo.
Selecting Nominator as the budget owner forces Display award points to nominators on and locks it — a nominator cannot fund an award whose value is hidden from them. Turn this back off by choosing a different budget owner level.
7

Configure advanced settings

A. Set Questions for Nominator — Create up to 20 questions (multiple choice, short text, or dynamic multiple choice) for nominators to answer.For multiple-choice questions, select Add other to append an Other option that lets nominators type their own answer. Set a character limit for the Other response between 1 and 1000 characters (default 250). A multiple-choice question can have up to 15 options in total, including Other.
Set Questions for Nominator configuration with question types
B. Citation Input — When a mandatory public question exists, you can skip the separate citation input.
Citation Input setting to skip citation when a mandatory public question exists
C. Rating Scale — Choose a rating scale for jury opinions: 10-point scale, 5-point scale, or binary (Approve or Decline).
Rating Scale options for 10-point scale and Binary approve or decline
D. Nomination Validity — Set a validity period after which open nominations are automatically declined.
Nomination Validity setting with period configuration
E. Self Nomination — When enabled, allows a nominator to nominate themselves.
Self Nomination toggle in the advanced award settings
F. Announcement and Feed Controls
  • Award Visibility — Public (visible to all) or Private (visible only to sender and recipient).
Award Visibility set to private notifying only sender and receiver
Award Visibility set to public with nominator visibility control option
  • Information Disclosed — Show/hide Award Giver, Citation by Nominator, and Award Name and Icon on the feed.
Information Disclosed checkboxes for Award Giver, Citation, and Award Name
  • Privacy Control — Centrally / Public / Private / By Nominator/Approver.
  • Team Size — Minimum 1 (2 for team-only awards), maximum 100 members.
Privacy Control and Team Size settings with Confirm and Create button
Click Confirm and Create to complete the award setup.

FAQs

Include senior leaders, managers, or employees who can objectively evaluate nominations. A group of 3–4 members ensures balanced decision-making.
Yes. Self-nomination can be enabled during the award setup under Advanced Settings.
Yes. Awards can be configured as public (visible to all) or private (visible only to sender and recipient).
Yes. Define eligibility criteria for nominators, nominees, and approvers using filters during award setup.
The jury can rate nominations using a 10-point scale, a 5-point scale, or a binary (Approve/Decline) scale.
Go to Recognition Approvals > View all nominations > Select the award > Jury View tab > Select the nomination > Rate accordingly.
Go to Recognition Approvals > View all nominations > Select the award > Moderator View tab > Select the nomination > Approve or Decline.If the moderator is the configured budget owner, the Approve modal includes the wallet-selection block and the points are deducted on approval. If the budget owner is set to the Nominator or an earlier approval level, that step is skipped for the moderator — the deduction has already happened (or will happen) at the configured level. The moderator also sees a note when the next approver they pick is the budget owner.
Recognition Approvals list showing nominations awaiting moderator review
Moderator View tab with nomination list and approve/decline controls
Nomination detail screen with Approve and Decline buttons for the moderator